References
Abdalla, A., Berry, P., Connell, P., Tran, Q.T., Buetre, B. 2003.
Agricultural Biotechnology: Potential for Use in Developing Countries.
ABARE
eReport 03.17. Canberra.
Alston, J., Hyde, J., Marra, M., Mitchell, P. 2002 An Ex-Ante Analysis of
the Benefits from the Adoption of Corn Rootworm Resistant Transgenic Corn Technology.
AgBioForum. 5(3): 71-84.
Bennett, R.M., Ismael, Y., Kambhampati, U., Morse, S. 2004. Economic Impact of
Genetically Modified Cotton in India.
AgBioForum. 7(3): 1-5.
Brooks, G. 2002. The Farm Level Impact of Using Bt Maize in Spain. Brookes West,
PG Economics.
Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Canola Council of Canada.
2001. An Agronomic and Economic Assessment of Transgenic Canola.
Cohen, J. 2005. Poorer nations turn to publicly developed GM crops.
Nature Biotechnology. (23)1. pp. 27-33.
Doane Marketing Research. 2002. Conservation Tillage Study.
The Cotton Foundation.
Fawcett, R., Towery, D. 2002. Conservation Tillage and Plant Biotechnology -
How New Technologies Can Improve the Environment By Reducing the Need to Plow.
Conservation Technology Information Center
(CTIC).
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Klotz-Ingram, C., Heimlich, R., Soule, M., McBride, W., Jans, S.
Economic and Evironmental Impacts of Herbicide Tolerant and Insect Resistant Crops in
the United States. The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global
Perspective. pp. 63-85. In: N.G. Kalaitzandonakes. New York: Kluwer.
Council for Biotechnology Information
(CBI).
2002. Explore the Benefits of Biotechnology. Washington, DC.
Fitt, G. 2003. Deployment and Impact of Transgenic Bt Cotton in Australia. The Economic
and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. pp. 141-164. In: N.G.
Kalaitzandonakes. New York: Kluwer.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. 2004. The State of Food Insecurity
in the World. Rome.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. 2003. The State of Food Insecurity
in the World. Rome.
Hammond, B.G., Campbell, K.W., Pilcher, C.D., Degooyer, T.A., Robinson, A.E., McMillan, B.L.,
et. al. 2004. Lower fumonison mycotoxin levels in the grain of Bt corn grown in the United
States in 2000-2002. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 52:1390-1397.
Hossain, et. al. 2004. Genetically Modified Cotton and Farmers' Health in China. International
Journal of Environmental Health. 10: 296-303.
Huang, J., Hu, R., Fan, C., Pray, C.E., Rozelle, S. 2003. Five Years of Bt Cotton in China -
The Benefits Continue. The
Plant Journal. 31: 423-430.
James, C. 2004. Preview: Global Review of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2004.
ISAAA Briefs No. 32. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
James, C. 2003. Preview: Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops. ISAAA Briefs
No. 30. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
James, C. 2002. Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2001 Feature: Bt
Cotton. ISAAA Briefs No. 26. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
M.G.E. de Bianconi. 2003. Two Years of Insect Protected Bt Transgenic Cotton in
Argentina : Regional Field Level Analysis of Financial Returns and Insecticide Use. Special
Issue: Bacillus thuringiensis. A Cornerstone of Modern Agriculture, Part II. Journal
of New Seeds. 5 2/3: 223-235.
Morse, S., Bennett, R., & Ismael, Y. 2004. Why Bt cotton pays for small-scale
producers in South Africa. Nature Biotechnology. 22: 379-380.
Penna, J.A., Lema, D. 2003. Adoption of Herbicide Tolerant Soybeans in Argentina:
An Economic Analysis. The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global
Perspective. pp. 203-221. In: N.G. Kalaitzandonakes. New York: Kluwer.
Phillips, P.W.B. 2003. The Economic Impacts of Herbicide Tolerant Canola in Canada.
The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. pp. 119-139.
In: N.G. Kalaitzandonakes. New York: Kluwer.
Qaim, M. 2003. Bt Cotton in India: Field Trial Results and Economic Projections.
World Development. 31(12): 2115-2127.
Qaim, M., Traxler, G. 2002. Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: Farm-level environmental
and welfare effects. 6th International ICABR Conference.
Ravello, Italy.
Rice, M. 2004. Transgenic Rootworm Corn - Assessing Potential Agronomic, Economic,
and Environmental Benefits. Plant Health
Progress.
Runge, C.F., Ryan, B. 2004.
The Global
Diffusion of Plant Biotechnology:
International
Adoption and Research in 2004. Dept. of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.
Minneapolis.
Runge, C.F., Ryan, B. 2004.
The Economic
Status and Development of Plant Biotechnology in 2003: Adoption, Research and Development in
the United States. Dept. of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota. Minneapolis.
Shaw, D. R., Bray, C.S. 2003 Foreign Matter and Seed Moisture in Glyphosate-Resistant
and Conventional Soybean Systems. Weed Technology. 17: 389-393.
Sujatha, S., Blumenthal, E. 2004. Impacts on US Agriculture of Biotechnology-Derived
Crops Planted in 2003 - An Update of Eleven Case Studies. National Center for Food and
Agricultural Policy (NCFAP).
Traxler, G., Godoy-Avilla, S., Falck-Zepeda, J., Espinoza-Arellano, J. De Jesús. 2003.
Transgenic Cotton in Mexico: A Case Study of the Comarca Lagunera. The Economic and
Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. pp. 183-202. In: N.G.
Kalaitzandonakes. New York: Kluwer.
Trigo, E.J., Cap, E.J. 2003. The impact of the introduction of transgenic
crops in Argentinean agriculture. AgBioForum. 6(3): 87-94.
United Nations. 2005. UN
Millennium Development Goals (MDG). New York.
United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs Statistics
Division. July 2004. Retrieved at:
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp
U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. U.S. Census Bureau
Population Estimates. 4 September 2004.
USDA-ERS. 2005. Retrieved at:
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/
World Consumer Spending 2004/2005. Euromonitor International. August 2004.
Retrieved at:
http://www.euromonitor.com/World_Consumer_Spending_2004-2005
World Factbook, The. Central Intelligence Agency. 13 January, 2004.
Retrieved at:
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/